10:04:54 From  Tilt, Jenna H  to  Everyone : https://oregonstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bsBr6O8fHKT5dB3
10:04:56 From  Kira  to  Everyone : Hi Everyone! 503-843-1176: Kira Glover-Cutter, representing ODOT
10:20:43 From  Althea Rizzo-OEM she/her  to  Everyone : •	Desired condition: No development in the tsunami inundation zone
•	How to get there: Public policies and public pressure to move populations outside of the hazard zone.
•	How to measure: No one dies in the tsunami
10:24:42 From  Althea Rizzo-OEM she/her  to  Everyone : Oregon Resilience Plan https://www.oregon.gov/oem/documents/oregon_resilience_plan_final.pdf
10:33:34 From  Charlie Plybon  to  Everyone : Sorry I was late to the game Pat: Desired condition: Little has changed to how we value, enjoy the coast and beaches 
How to get there: Pay and plan for the adaptation strategies and relocation (where possible) rather than pay and plan for the re-build and mitigation post-catastrophe. Slow relocate.
How to measure: chronic hazards and the # of problems/permits those are triggering can be a slow, over time measure of how we’re addressing acute hazards. 
Headline: Oregonians retreat to adaptive living post tsunami. Beach recreation resumes.
10:39:25 From  Meg Reed  to  Everyone : How does the model, or can the model, differentiate the difference between private property in need of protection from erosion vs. public infrastructure? I.e. Highway 101?
10:39:42 From  Charlie Plybon  to  Everyone : Can we be clear what we are protecting?
10:40:17 From  Charlie Plybon  to  Everyone : Is beach recreation a human activity that would be protected?
10:40:42 From  Meg Reed  to  Everyone : Thank you!
10:42:04 From  Charlie Plybon  to  Everyone : The example says “beach protection”
10:52:30 From  Mike Harryman  to  Everyone : Peter, I need to jump on to another call. Thank you for leading this effort!
10:52:36 From  Michael Howard (he/him)  to  Everyone : I am more interested in High Impact than Worst Case
10:52:38 From  Meg Reed  to  Everyone : Would agree with Pat
10:52:45 From  sabsher  to  Everyone : Agree with Pat
10:52:47 From  Charlie Plybon  to  Everyone : Agree with Pat
10:52:56 From  Jack Barth, OSU  to  Everyone : Yes, explore since worst case is plausible if ice sheets collapse.
10:53:24 From  Patrick Corcoran  to  Everyone : yikes good point jack
10:53:26 From  Tilt, Jenna H  to  Everyone : Survey link:  https://oregonstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bsBr6O8fHKT5dB3
10:53:44 From  Charlie Plybon  to  Everyone : Thanks Jack, now I”m depressed and have changed my opinion:)
10:55:07 From  Mote, Philip W  to  Everyone : Even if 2m sea level rise does not happen by 2100, it is fairly likely by 2200. Any appetite for thinking that far out? Esp with the overlay of rising likelihood of M9
10:55:13 From  Mote, Philip W  to  Everyone : Earthquake and tsunami
10:56:19 From  Meg Reed  to  Everyone : Flood ordinance scenario - apply FEMA flood standards to areas affected by SLR. This would affect a larger area than what is required now to be regulated under FEMA flood regulations. 
10:56:35 From  Patrick Corcoran  to  Everyone : ooooh good idea
10:56:42 From  Mote, Philip W  to  Everyone : +1 Meg - very interesting idea
10:56:42 From  Charlie Plybon  to  Everyone : Indeed Meg - great idea
11:00:06 From  Mote, Philip W  to  Everyone : I’ve always loved the 12-square tile diagram. Now I have a thought based on this discussion and Meg’s comment… and that’s the potential path dependence. That is, a policy scenario that is now exceedingly unlikely might become more palatable if the climate scenario unfolds higher than expected. That is, rather than just modeling each of the 12 tiles as a fixed evolution, what if you start out at one extreme but 20 years later the climate /CSZ scenario goes a different way and the policy changes?
11:00:52 From  Ruggiero, Peter  to  Everyone : adaptation pathways!
11:01:18 From  Mote, Philip W  to  Everyone : Ah yes, that’s the expression.
11:01:37 From  Steven Dundas  to  Everyone : Thanks for this comment Phil - path dependence is definitely something I am interested in and understanding what those "new" options would be is an important discussion
11:02:01 From  Mote, Philip W  to  Everyone : I think what I was driving at is the paths look different once you have sunk costs
11:10:25 From  Meg Reed  to  Everyone : https://www.oregon.gov/lcd/LAR/Pages/CFEC.aspx#:~:text=The%20commission%20initiated%20rulemaking%20at%20its%20September%202020%20meeting.&text=The%20purpose%20of%20the%20committee,people%20experienced%20in%20equity%20issues.
11:21:19 From  Charlie Plybon  to  Everyone : Workforce centers is really good to think through from a socio-demographic standpoint, we really exposed a lot of that importance on the coast with COVID for sure
11:24:54 From  Tilt, Jenna H  to  Everyone : https://oregonstate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bsBr6O8fHKT5dB3
11:26:57 From  Hadziomerspahic, Amila  to  Everyone : http://explorer.bee.oregonstate.edu/Topic/CoastalResilience/
11:27:56 From  Gwen Shaughnessy  to  Everyone : Meg - that would be great!
11:27:58 From  Michael Howard (he/him)  to  Everyone : I would love to see it.
11:31:22 From  Althea Rizzo-OEM she/her  to  Everyone : Thanks for the great work.
11:31:43 From  Charlie Plybon  to  Everyone : It was driven by money mismanagement really
11:32:09 From  Charlie Plybon  to  Everyone : but agree a terrible loss
11:33:18 From  Tilt, Jenna H  to  Everyone : THank you!!
11:33:26 From  sabsher  to  Everyone : Charlie, Tillamook County already sent a letter of support. 
11:33:30 From  Michael Howard (he/him)  to  Everyone : Thanks all!
11:35:18 From  sabsher  to  Everyone : Good Bye Everyone!  Great to see you!  Be well!